A randomised trial of a remote home support programme for infants with major congenital heart disease

Source: McCrossan, B., et al. 2012 - Pubmed ID: 22888158

Setting: UK, Hospital

Study design:

RCT

 

Follow up: 10 weeks

Patient group:

Sample size:
Total:  83
IGvideo: 35
IGphone: 24
CG: 24

 

Inclusion criteria:

  • Infants with complex Congenital heart disease or congestive heart failure
Type of technology:

Video consultation

  • Monitoring
  • Questioning

 

Phone call

  • Monitoring
  • Questioning
Intervention:

Intervention: IG1video: Scheduled videoconsultations weekly or twice-weekly depending on wishes of parents or clinicians. Initial enquiry if any concerns, systematic questioning related to clinical status and obtainment of clinical data.
IG2phone: Same format as video except clinician was unable to visually assess the patient.

 

Duration: 10 weeks
Add on: NA

 

Control group: Usual care

Clinical effect/ Patient safety:

Clinical effect:

  • Health service episodes ↓
  • Probability of hospital admission ↓

 

Patient safety: NA

Patient experiences/ Staff experiences:

Patient experiences:

  • Parents were extremely positive about the video consultations
  • Parent satisfaction ↑

Staff experiences:

  • The clinician agreed that the video consultations were beneficial
  • Clinicians confidence in medical decisions ↑
Costs and organization:

Investment:

Equipment/Materials

  • Videoconsultaion equipment

 

Running:
Staff resources

  • Video and telephone consultations

 

Organization:  NA

 

Health care utilization:

  • Health service episodes ↓
  • Probability of hospital admission ↓
  • Cost pr patient patient ↓
Scroll to Top

Information

“↑”: Statistically significant increase

“↓”: Statistically significant decrease

“→”: Statistically insignificant (no difference)