Feasibility and efficacy of cognitive telerehabilitation in early Alzheimer’s disease: a pilot study

Source: Jelcic et al. 2014 - Pubmed ID: 25284993

Setting: Italy, Single-center and Hospital

Study design:

RCT

 

Follow-up: 3 months

Patient group:

Sample size:
Total: 27(27)
IG: 7(7)
CG-live: 10(10)
CG-UC: 10(10)

 

Inclusion criteria:

  • Alzheimer’s Disease
  • Early stage
  • Clinical Dementia Rating score 0.5-1.0
  • Stable psycho-active medication
Type of technology:

Videoconsultation

  • Lexical-semantic stimulation
Intervention:

Intervention: Lexical-semantic stimulation through video was compared to face-to-face (live) therapy and unstructured cognitive treatment

 

Duration: 3 months
Add on:  –

 

Control group:

  • Group1: Face-to-face therapy
  • Group2: Unstructured cognitive treatment
Clinical effect/ Patient safety:

Clinical effect:

  • Mini-mental state ↑ (IG=CG-live>CG-UC)
  • Verbal naming test ↑ (IG=CG-live>CG-UC)
  • Phonemic and semantic fluency
  •  Story immediate recall ↑ (IG=CG-live>CG-UC)
  • Story delayed recall
  • Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test immediate and delayed recall

 

Patient safety: NA

Patient experiences/ Staff experiences:

Patient experiences:

  • 6/7 intervention patients rated satisfaction as 10/10.
  • All would advise the treatment to friends

 

Staff experiences: NA

Costs and organization:

Investment: NA

 

Running:
Staff Resources

  • Video-delivered lexical-semantic stimulation

 

Organization: NA

 

Health care utilization: NA

Scroll to Top

Information

“↑”: Statistically significant increase

“↓”: Statistically significant decrease

“→”: Statistically insignificant (no difference)